tyre reviews and ratings submit your tyre review browse by tyre type browse by tyre brand browse by car model

Avon ZZ3 reviews

Fact sheet

 

User Submitted Ratings:

Dry Grip
72%
Wet Grip
67%
Road Feedback
64%
Progressiveness
66%
Wear
64%
Comfort
73%
Buy again
63%

(add your review)

User Reviews:

Given 63% (breakdown) while driving a Honda Civic Type R (215-40-17-W)
Driving on a combination of roads for 30,000 spirited miles
A good tyre design with very progressive grip generation in both wet and dry conditions. My complaints would be a lack of feedback caused in my opinion by a thin tyre side wall and a tendancy to pick up punctures at an alarming rate. In total I've purchased 11 Avon ZZ3's and have lost 5 to un-repairable punctures or high speed deflations.
(LINK) Posted at 2007-06-01 13:12:29 | Was this review helpful? Please login to vote
Given 93% (breakdown) while driving a Nissan 350z (245-45-18-W)
Driving on mostly country roads for 5,000 spirited miles
A top tyre for the 350z - excellent value for money. I've just bought a second set of rears I like them so much. Sooo much better than the Bridgestone 040's in the wet/cold.

Also consider the Falken FK452's as these have been rated highly too.
(LINK) Posted at 2007-05-21 23:32:56 | Was this review helpful? Please login to vote
Given 81% (breakdown) while driving a Ford fiesta st (205-40-17-V)
Driving on a combination of roads for 15,000 spirited miles
I had these fitted to my Skoda VRS and they were a revalation !
The previous tyres were Bridgestone Potenzas (poor wet performance) but the Avons are fantastic.
There's nothing like having some confidence in your tyres when it's tipping down, these are the ones for me in future. They are great in the dry as well. I've had Goodyear F1, Toyos etc, ignore the hype, fit these.
(LINK) Posted at 2008-07-16 19:07:20 | Was this review helpful? Please login to vote
Given 23% (breakdown) while driving a Ford Focus MK1 (215-45-17-W)
Driving on mostly town for 8,000 average miles
After driving several focus st's before buying mine 2nd hand these where on the front. Nothing special in the dry but in the wet they because dangerous. The front end of the car skated around and they give no confidence at all. Since then I have had goodyear f1's and kumhos and even champiro's but nothing was everas bad as these. There are alot more tyres for less money whihc give you more.
(LINK) Posted at 2008-06-26 16:01:52 | Was this review helpful? Please login to vote
Given 0% (breakdown) while driving a Ford (---)
Driving on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
I have been in the motor trade for approx 12 years and have seen 10,000 if not more tyres to be fitted to various cars of all shapes and sizes. The feed back i have had from customers about the ZZ3 is generally quite positive. Having said that i'm not convinced that some, if not a lot of motorists understand what is really going on beneath themselves and the road. In a nut shell, the ZZ3 is a good tyre, but providing you don't drive anything bigger or maybe heavier than a Vectra. Place them on a Rover 75 (i've seen this time & time again) & your asking for major trouble. But overall, they aren't too bad. Just don't fit them to the bigger than the average saloon. You've been warned!!!
(LINK) Posted at 2008-04-25 22:02:01 | Was this review helpful? Please login to vote
Given 87% (breakdown) while driving a BMW E39 5 series (235-35-17-W)
Driving on mostly motorways for 116,000 spirited miles
I have always stuck to Pirelli tyres (P zero) in the past. I needed some tyres quickly and could only get Avon. Well frankly I think that I would now ask for Avon. Good in both the wet and the dry with good grip on cornering. Country roads are coped with easily and so are motorways. Great performance all round
(LINK) Posted at 2008-01-29 10:57:21 | Was this review helpful? Please login to vote
Given 63% (breakdown) while driving a Volvo S60 TS (225-45-17-W)
Driving on a combination of roads for 26,000 average miles
Nice brand tyre for the price but wears badly for heavier cars. Also the outerwall seems to wear first, even on the back. Didn't last to well, front 10,000 and back 15,000.
(LINK) Posted at 2008-01-05 14:52:55 | Was this review helpful? Please login to vote
Given 43% (breakdown) while driving a Audi S6 (255-40-17-W)
Driving on a combination of roads for 8,000 spirited miles
I'm sorry to say, but i think these tyres are dangerous! My car is maintained to the highest standards and so i know it is the tyres giving me problems. I have no idea what the car is going to do in the wet despite being quattro. The tyres have loads of tread left on them but i am changing all 4 as i cant live with them anymore. I usually drive on manufacturer recommended tyres, and thats what i'm going back to. They are also the noisiest tyres i have ever known. I'm fed up of telling passengers that its the tyres making the noise and not my wheel bearings!
(LINK) Posted at 2007-11-21 19:34:59 | Was this review helpful? Please login to vote
Given 63% (breakdown) while driving a Toyota MK2 MR2 Turbo (235-40-17-W)
Driving on mostly country roads for 5,000 miles
A good all round middle range tyre, impressive for the money, a nice progressive, safe road tyre, will never break any lap records with this tyre but recommended for road use, certainly on par with Toyo Proxies in most situations.
(LINK) Posted at 2007-06-05 22:30:59 | Was this review helpful? Please login to vote
Given 84% (breakdown) while driving a Nissan 350z (245-45-18-W)
Driving on mostly country roads for 20,000 spirited miles
No Comments Left
(LINK) Posted at 2007-05-21 23:32:56 | Was this review helpful? Please login to vote
Find these reviews useful? Why not add your own tyre review and help others pick a tyre!