Bridgestone Potenza RE040

These have been on the back of my Mazda 3 sport and recently moved to the front . CSC3s on the back now and previously on the front. Dry grip is distinctly average (even with 6mm they have less than the contis with 2.5mm) damp weather they slip and slide in acceleration though are fine in breaking and ok in cornering.

Biggest problem... very noisy tyre! The Mazda 3 is no quiet car, built to a budget. When they were on the back the whole car had a resonant noise, now with them on the front they are very noisy and it is obvious they are the culprit as the noise has shifted forward. Ok not noisy enough to make me get rid of them as they have plenty of tread, but a regular trip from the South East to the North East of the UK does now get tiresome with the rumble these tyres make. Can't comment on wear, they did 12K on the back and used 2mm, about 1mm more gone over 4k on the front.

Will stick to Contis from now on in, cheaper and quieter.

Not really a tyre buff myself so can't comment on the specifics in detail but just felt tyres did not have great grip. I drive a late model Audi A4 2.0T and am based in Brisbane, Australia so weather here is mostly dry and warm 9 months of the year. Summer months are hot and balmy with tropical rain periods. Being a front wheel drive, when accelerating with a bit of keeness, traction control nearly always kicked clearly feeling the tyres could not grip enough for this car (in the dry). In the wet, never felt unsafe but drove more cautiously knowing heavy acceleration would not be pretty from the lights. Maybe this has something to do with being a front wheel drive causing the front to lift slightly, hense loosing traction - I'm not sure but I am putting a full set of Michelin Pilot Sport PS3's on tomorrow so will be sure to give 'em a good test. Being a 1st time reviewer, I'll do my best to come back in a few weeks to provide comparison. Also, I've rated tread wear as average but again, I may be a little harse as it may be the way the tyres are aligned/balanced (I really have no clue) but they are worn heavily on the outside edge - mates say they look almost bald (all tyres - changed front to back 6 months ago) but there seems to be plenty of tread on the inside. Have acheieved 35,000klms (24k miles)which I consider poor to average as I got over 70,0000klms from an earlier car (Subaru Liberty) and my last Audi 1.8T I traded after 3 years, just under 50,000klms (33k miles)with the original tyres (unfortunately can't remember brand). Think I had Michelins of some sort but I know this is bit of a nana car and all wheel drive so clearly going to be less aggresive on tyre wear. What I do find interesting about the Potenza tyre is that even though I know nothing about tyres, I never really liked the feel or how they handled - which seems to be supported by the many reviews on this site, which would include a lot of people who do know something. Heading into Xmas, wishing everyone safe driving.

they were on the car when i bought it. Driving in roads with corners and medium surface (Greece) iam not happy at all especially in wet conditions

I replaced my old RE040's with a new set all round and found the usual new tyre "squirmyness" but even after 500 miles the fronts still tended to wash out slightly in tight fast corners. It's improved with miles but it's not quite been the same compared to my old set at their best. I've tried newer Elises with ADO7s and found them to be slightly better all round but was concerned about wet weather grip. Decided to change my 2001 Elise for a newer one so I may know more soon as the Yokohama's are standard fit after 2006.

I bought my car from a dealership 12 month ago with new tyres, I previously drove a Seat Leon FR with Pirelli and Dunlops getting only 10-12k miles. I've had well over 17k miles on these tyres. I don't drive stupidly but do drive fast and never had any problems with grip on wet or dry roads. The only problem is they are quite loud buy for the mileage I'm getting out of the tyres and the safety record I'm prepared to suffer a little noise.

Very disappointing performance and longevity on a car driven gently. After they were half-worn, the grip on mixed or rough surfaces(wet or dry) disappeared and the rear of the car seemed to be trying to "steer" itself and made the car feel unstable in a straight line. I'm a Chauffeur/Driver in London, I drive about 42,000 miles a year and for a "premium" tyre to perform like this is very disturbing. Needless to say, I will not be buying these again, they replaced a pair of Dunlop SP9000 which used to last 18,000 to 20,000 miles under the same conditions. Unfortunately they became unavailable when I needed them!

I had 225/45/18 RE040's on my Mazda RX-8. They survived for an impressive 26,000 miles (half life on front and half on rear) and I have purchased another set. For casual driving they are quite noisey tyres but I am prepared to sacrifice noise for safety! For agressive driving in the DRY they have good accelerating/braking grip, and very rarely step out of line when cornering. For agressive driving in the WET they perform quite well with heavy breaking but spin quite excessively when accelerating from a stand still. Cornering grip is not great and with rear-wheel drive you will regularly be sideways. Snow grip is absolutely awful with these tyres but I suppose they were never designed for it. Get some winter ones :) I got a rear puncture (rear-wheel drive don't forget) and temporarily replaced the tyre with a Pirelli P-Zero Rosso tyre (identical size and tread depth) - so with a Bridgestone on one drive-wheel and a Pirelli on the other drive-wheel, it was the perfect time to compare. The Bridgestone always spun or locked-up in the wet first, but I can't comment on the dry grip comparison because I wasn't driving agressively with different tyres on each side of the car.
Allround these tyres are great in dry, slippy in wet, but long lasting.

i have had an elise for several years and have always had oe spec potenzas fitted. however, it turns out the original compound (bz)that bridgestone developed for the elise has now been discontinued and replaced with another but with the same code. these tyres are completely different! i thought at first that it was because they were new and had to be scrubbed in. a few hundred miles later and the twitchyness was no better. it felt like there was slop in the sidewall when changing direction. once it had "fallen over" the tyre gripped as well as expected but changing direction the other way caused a slop in the other direction. if i had to swerve at high speed with a left/right action (eg animal running out)it would have caused a massive tank slapper. i tried increased tyre pressure, then lower pressure but all to no avail. i eventually had them removed and fitted a set of yokohama ad07's which are brilliant. to add insult to injury, my tyre fitter sent them back to bridgestone for investigation and was told that they showed signs of being run in an overladen condition! in a 720kg car!!!!!
will never buy these again and would think twice about any bridgestone tyre.