tyre reviews by tyre tyre reviews by car tyre articles submit tyre revew discussion about tyres
tyre reviews and ratings
Home > Tyre > Bridgestone > Potenza RE040 Page 2
Register | Login | Review your tyres

Bridgestone Potenza RE040


Show all: Bridgestone tyres, Passenger Car Summer Ultra High Performance tyres
The Bridgestone Potenza RE040 is a Ultra High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars. Below is data from 41 tyre reviews averaging 65% over 730,215 miles driven.
 


Bridgestone Potenza RE040
Dry Grip
80%

Wet Grip
57%

Road Feedback
75%

Progressiveness
69%

Wear
66%

Comfort
57%

Buy again
54%


Bridgestone Potenza RE040 Reviews

Given 90% (breakdown) while driving a Subaru Legacy (225-45-18-)
Driving on mostly motorways for 44,000 average miles
No Comments Left
tyre reviewed on August 5, 2011
Given 76% (breakdown) while driving a Lotus Elise (225-45-17-)
Driving on mostly country roads for 50,000 spirited miles
I replaced my old RE040's with a new set all round and found the usual new tyre "squirmyness" but even after 500 miles the fronts still tended to wash out slightly in tight fast corners. It's improved with miles but it's not quite been the same compared to my old set at their best. I've tried newer Elises with ADO7s and found them to be slightly better all round but was concerned about wet weather grip. Decided to change my 2001 Elise for a newer one so I may know more soon as the Yokohama's are standard fit after 2006.
tyre reviewed on July 18, 2011
Looking to buy the Bridgestone Potenza RE040? Click here to search for the best price for the Bridgestone Potenza RE040 or any other tyre.
 
Given 77% (breakdown) while driving a BMW E46 330D Sport (255-35-18-)
Driving on mostly motorways for 17,500 spirited miles
I bought my car from a dealership 12 month ago with new tyres, I previously drove a Seat Leon FR with Pirelli and Dunlops getting only 10-12k miles. I've had well over 17k miles on these tyres. I don't drive stupidly but do drive fast and never had any problems with grip on wet or dry roads. The only problem is they are quite loud buy for the mileage I'm getting out of the tyres and the safety record I'm prepared to suffer a little noise.
tyre reviewed on March 18, 2011
Given 63% (breakdown) while driving a Honda Civic Type R (205-45-17-W)
Driving on mostly country roads for 6,000 spirited miles
No Comments Left
tyre reviewed on February 8, 2011
Given 73% (breakdown) while driving a Mercedes Benz S320 (265-40-18-W)
Driving on a combination of roads for 10,000 easy going miles
Very disappointing performance and longevity on a car driven gently. After they were half-worn, the grip on mixed or rough surfaces(wet or dry) disappeared and the rear of the car seemed to be trying to "steer" itself and made the car feel unstable in a straight line. I'm a Chauffeur/Driver in London, I drive about 42,000 miles a year and for a "premium" tyre to perform like this is very disturbing. Needless to say, I will not be buying these again, they replaced a pair of Dunlop SP9000 which used to last 18,000 to 20,000 miles under the same conditions. Unfortunately they became unavailable when I needed them!
tyre reviewed on January 30, 2011
Given 76% (breakdown) while driving a Mazda RX8 (225-45-17-)
Driving on mostly country roads for 26,000 average miles
I had 225/45/18 RE040's on my Mazda RX-8. They survived for an impressive 26,000 miles (half life on front and half on rear) and I have purchased another set. For casual driving they are quite noisey tyres but I am prepared to sacrifice noise for safety! For agressive driving in the DRY they have good accelerating/braking grip, and very rarely step out of line when cornering. For agressive driving in the WET they perform quite well with heavy breaking but spin quite excessively when accelerating from a stand still. Cornering grip is not great and with rear-wheel drive you will regularly be sideways. Snow grip is absolutely awful with these tyres but I suppose they were never designed for it. Get some winter ones :) I got a rear puncture (rear-wheel drive don't forget) and temporarily replaced the tyre with a Pirelli P-Zero Rosso tyre (identical size and tread depth) - so with a Bridgestone on one drive-wheel and a Pirelli on the other drive-wheel, it was the perfect time to compare. The Bridgestone always spun or locked-up in the wet first, but I can't comment on the dry grip comparison because I wasn't driving agressively with different tyres on each side of the car.
Allround these tyres are great in dry, slippy in wet, but long lasting.
tyre reviewed on January 14, 2011
Given 54% (breakdown) while driving a Lotus Elise (225-45-17-)
Driving on mostly country roads for 300 spirited miles
i have had an elise for several years and have always had oe spec potenzas fitted. however, it turns out the original compound (bz)that bridgestone developed for the elise has now been discontinued and replaced with another but with the same code. these tyres are completely different! i thought at first that it was because they were new and had to be scrubbed in. a few hundred miles later and the twitchyness was no better. it felt like there was slop in the sidewall when changing direction. once it had "fallen over" the tyre gripped as well as expected but changing direction the other way caused a slop in the other direction. if i had to swerve at high speed with a left/right action (eg animal running out)it would have caused a massive tank slapper. i tried increased tyre pressure, then lower pressure but all to no avail. i eventually had them removed and fitted a set of yokohama ad07's which are brilliant. to add insult to injury, my tyre fitter sent them back to bridgestone for investigation and was told that they showed signs of being run in an overladen condition! in a 720kg car!!!!!
will never buy these again and would think twice about any bridgestone tyre.
tyre reviewed on December 18, 2010
Given 71% (breakdown) while driving a Vauxhall (245-45-18-W)
Driving on a combination of roads for 12,500 average miles
Had car from new. Had to replace 2 front tyres after only 12,500 miles. Tyre noise poor, trying different make - so far so good (less road noise).
tyre reviewed on October 18, 2010
Given 80% (breakdown) while driving a Nissan 350z (245-45-18-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 25,000 spirited miles
For road driving these tyres are great. Let's face it, the Nissan engineers seected them when building the 350z, so they are clearly good for the car. Anyone looking to take them on track with their z will enjoy the dry grip they give but may struggle to feel confident in the wet. I am not a fan of wet track driving on these tyres. Even with the TC turned off as some enthusiasts prefer.
tyre reviewed on September 18, 2010
Given 66% (breakdown) while driving a Mazda RX8 (225-45-18-)
Driving on mostly motorways for 6,000 spirited miles
No Comments Left
tyre reviewed on September 18, 2010

Find these reviews useful? Why not add your own tyre review and help others pick a tyre!


Want this tyre? TyreReviews has joined forces with lovetyres.com to offer unbeatable prices on the best rated tyres. Combine the trust of your local fitting centre with these great prices on the best tyres on the market!
Width:
Profile:
Height:
Speed Rating: