Falken Azenis FK510

Dry Grip 94%
Wet Grip 94%
Road Feedback 88%
Handling 91%
Wear 90%
Comfort 76%
Buy again 90%

The Falken Azenis FK510 is a Ultra High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Car

This tyre replaced the Falken FK453

Show All

Tyre review data from 8 tyre reviews averaging 89% over 9,700 miles driven.

Reports

Tyre Test Highlights

2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test - 2nd of 20 tyres

  • Positive - Good controllability, high lateral stability and short braking distances on dry surfaces, well priced
  • Negative - Relatively high rolling resistance
  • Overall - Exemplary

2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Shootout - 3rd of 43 tyres

2017 Auto Bild Sports Cars Tyre Test - 4th of 9 tyres

  • Positive - Short braking distances on wet surfaces, good handling and steering feel in the dry and wet, attractive price
  • Negative - Slightly slower steering than the best on test, low level of comfort, high rolling resistance
  • Overall - Recommended
Sorry, we don't currently have any label data for the Falken Azenis FK510
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Falken Azenis FK510. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!

Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

capatha

To verify you're human please type the word you see above in the box below.


 
Size Price Range  
225/40 R18 £66.98 - £69.00 (5 Prices) Compare Prices >>
225/45 R17 £62.00 - £74.60 (5 Prices) Compare Prices >>
225/45 R18 £85.75 - £94.00 (5 Prices) Compare Prices >>
235/35 R19 £97.02 - £114.70 (5 Prices) Compare Prices >>
Available in 65 tyre sizes - View all.

Top Falken Azenis FK510 Review

Given 100% (breakdown) while driving a Honda Civic Type R (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
Better than Pirelli
64 - tyre reviewed on July 6, 2016   

Latest Falken Azenis FK510 Reviews

Have you driven on the Falken Azenis FK510 tyre?

Please help millions of other drivers make an informed tyre choice and pick the correct tyres for their car by submitting your review of the Azenis FK510.

Review Your Tyres >>

Given 100% (breakdown) while driving a BMW 330 XD Coupe (225/45 R17 W) on mostly motorways for 500 average miles
Wet and dry grip of the tires are amazing.They added +30 km at the turns. Fuel consumption is much more lower than the previous tires. Tires are also silent.They fitted so well on my Bmw 330xd coupe. I ve just made 500 km i cant say anything about the wear for now. If u have a sport car you should try those tires. I ll definetely buy those tires again.
0 - tyre reviewed on March 26, 2017   
Given 75% (breakdown) while driving a Audi A4 1.8T Quattro (225/40 R18 W) on mostly motorways for 1,000 average miles
The grip in both dry and wet is very good, no wheelspin wel accelerating hard.

But they are very uncomfortable, the rolling noise is very loud comparing to my previous Continental tyres. On bad roads its even more uncomfortable because you notice every pothole.

Also much more fuel consumption, i didnt expected that a tyre with EU label E would so much more fuel then a EU label B tyre.

Not a good tyre for your daily comfortable car like my Audi A4.

Next time i would go for a premium tyre again like Michelin, Continetal or Goodyear. tyres from the big brands are just a bit better, and thats why they are a bit more expensive.

4 - tyre reviewed on March 13, 2017   
Given 79% (breakdown) while driving a BMW 325 coupe (225/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 3,000 spirited miles
This tyre is excellent in the wet and dry, I have read reviews in which these tyres have lost out to the bigger brands on the dry tests but I think in normal operation these differences are so small very few people will ever notice the difference between a Falken and Continental. They do have a lot of grip but can feel a little plastic on the limit.
15 - tyre reviewed on January 19, 2017   
Given 90% (breakdown) while driving a Skoda Octavia (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 2,000 average miles
Falkens replaced the factory fitted pirellis cinturato p7 ecoimpact in 16.000miles, which were pretty good actually in all aspects but after the first 8.000 miles have developped a drowning noise in 40mph and around 60mph.The 510 is actually a little better in everything, especially in the wet than the p7.it handles very well both in dry and wet ,it doesn't spin from a standstill as the p7 did, it is silent and comfortable-can't tell about the wear though-it's too early. the only thing that the tyre lacks as opposed to the p7 is steering response where although an XL tyre,when driving it really hard response is slower than pirellis and needs more lock.
5 - tyre reviewed on December 18, 2016   
Given 87% (breakdown) while driving a Mazda 6 (225/45 R18 W) on mostly town for 0 average miles
I have changed all four tires to Falken 510 and drove this Tyre for 2000 miles ,I felt the grip was good in both wet and dry also my car progress is good.Good tires for the price and quality as premium tires.
13 - tyre reviewed on September 13, 2016   

See all 8 customer reviews of the Falken Azenis FK510 (newest first) >>