Falken Azenis FK510

Dry Grip 91%
Wet Grip 91%
Road Feedback 86%
Handling 84%
Wear 77%
Comfort 76%
Buy again 79%

The Falken Azenis FK510 is a Ultra High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Car

This tyre replaced the Falken FK453

Show All

Tyre review data from 21 tyre reviews averaging 83% over 240,835 miles driven.


Tyre Test Highlights

2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test - 2nd of 20 tyres

  • Positive - Good controllability, high lateral stability and short braking distances on dry surfaces, well priced
  • Negative - Relatively high rolling resistance
  • Overall - Exemplary

2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Shootout - 3rd of 43 tyres

2017 EVO Summer Tyre Test - 4th of 9 tyres

  • Positive - Excellent in dry and wet testing, subjectively and objectively. Strong aquaplaning result.
  • Negative - Heaviest tyre on test, highest rolling resistance, least refined on the road.
Sorry, we don't currently have any label data for the Falken Azenis FK510
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Falken Azenis FK510. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!

Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address


To verify you're human please type the word you see above in the box below.

Size Price Range  
215/45 R17 £63.10 - £66.00 (6 Prices) Compare Prices >>
225/40 R18 £69.10 - £72.80 (6 Prices) Compare Prices >>
225/45 R17 £60.40 - £65.60 (6 Prices) Compare Prices >>
225/45 R18 £90.10 - £125.00 (7 Prices) Compare Prices >>
225/50 R17 £80.20 - £88.00 (6 Prices) Compare Prices >>
255/35 R20 £122.60 - £127.00 (6 Prices) Compare Prices >>
Available in 86 tyre sizes - View all.

Top Falken Azenis FK510 Review

Given 100% (breakdown) while driving a Honda Civic Type R (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
Better than Pirelli
149 - tyre reviewed on July 6, 2016   

Latest Falken Azenis FK510 Reviews

Have you driven on the Falken Azenis FK510 tyre?

Please help millions of other drivers make an informed tyre choice and pick the correct tyres for their car by submitting your review of the Azenis FK510.

Review Your Tyres >>

Given 80% (breakdown) while driving a BMW bmw (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 150,000 spirited miles
Love Falken!
Have been driving BMW's for over 20 years...... have always swapped to Falken when tyres needed changing.

Latest set front and rear RF's on a 430d .... great tyres...why pay more....these Tyres are so underrated!
7 - tyre reviewed on February 10, 2018   
Given 89% (breakdown) while driving a BMW E60 M5 (255/40 R19 W) on a combination of roads for 7,000 spirited miles
Running 510s on front of bmw e60 m5 5.0 v10 and Michelin pilot super sports on rear and drive the car really hard often . I was expecting to lose the front end a little especially in the wet but can honestly say I’m really impressed with how they are performing . Would never have thought to fit falkens but they were new on when bought the car . rears needed changed and put my favs on . I’m very tempted to put 510s on rear when I’ve hammered these because of how well they have done hard decision as Michelin’s are so so good . Would be very happy to test out some 510s on rear for you
2 - tyre reviewed on January 24, 2018   
Given 89% (breakdown) while driving a Ford S Max (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 22,000 average miles
Positive: Fantastic grip on wet and dry, very responsive / accurate in sudden change, Low noise.
Negative: Comfort, probably due the firm sidewalls. Bad fuel consumption, at least 6-7% more then the Primacy 3.
this means that at least 250 liters of diesel fuel high consumption in 60,000 Km, which, multiplied by 1.5€ per liter it is, 375€ more, which does not justify the 200€ paid less for 4 tires, compared to a premium tire train.
3 - tyre reviewed on December 24, 2017   
Given 67% (breakdown) while driving a Peugeot 3008 (225/50 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 12,000 average miles
I`m never been one to buy Budget Tyres, I`ve mainly been impressed with Kumho`s, the Kumho Ecsta KU39 has always served me well, with a good combination and performance and wear, running two full sets on the 3008, which usually get me around 20k of running.
I fitted 4 F510`s at the end of April after being told Kumho had replaced the my trusty KU39`, they are quiet, perform as well as the KU39`s but much to my disappointment, the front two were on the bars at 12,000 miles, not a good return by anyone`s standard, and that`s from a moderate driver.

Just had two new Kumho PS71`s fitted on the front today, lesson learnt!!
0 - tyre reviewed on November 23, 2017   
Given 87% (breakdown) while driving a Opel Astra J 1.4 turbo (225/45 R17 V) on mostly country roads for 1,000 average miles
Great tyres !! Fantastic grip on wet and very good on dry (I think they are a little bit less responsive / accurate in sudden change of course as my previous Good year asymmetric 2). Low noise ,good fuel consumption! The only bad thing is the comfort...not good as my previous Good Year and this is probably because of the firm sidewalls !
I would definitely buy them again!!!
4 - tyre reviewed on November 16, 2017   

See all 21 customer reviews of the Falken Azenis FK510 (newest first) >>