Hankook Ventus K104

Dry Grip 68%
Wet Grip 42%
Road Feedback 50%
Handling 44%
Wear 55%
Comfort 61%
Buy again 42%

The Hankook Ventus K104 is a High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Car

Show All

Tyre review data from 11 tyre reviews averaging 52% over 76,040 miles driven.

    Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Hankook Ventus K104
Size Fuel Wet Noise Weight
205/45 R16 00          
225/50 R16 00          
215/40 R17 00          
235/40 R17 00          
255/35 R18 00          
245/40 R18 00          
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Hankook Ventus K104. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!

Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

capatha

To verify you're human please type the word you see above in the box below.


Latest Hankook Ventus K104 Reviews

Have you driven on the Hankook Ventus K104 tyre?

Please help millions of other drivers make an informed tyre choice and pick the correct tyres for their car by submitting your review of the Ventus K104.

Review Your Tyres >>

Given 50% while driving a BMW 320i (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 20,000 spirited miles
Only for drift in the wet tarmac. Good at dry but poor in wet.
0 - tyre reviewed on March 18, 2013   
These are the best tyres in the world. Watch now!
Given 57% while driving a MG MGTF (215/40 R16) on mostly town for 500 average miles
Not too bad at all - had these on the front and they spent about a month there while waiting for my new tyres.

Responsive and crisp with a good wear rate - not suitable for wet use on anything other than a 4 door saloon though as grip was not good at all.

Previous comment about proper suspension setup is probably about right. The TF rivals and probably just beats the MX5 on handling (I drive both regular) and they both make good use of the performance of a tyre rather than just being steering tools.
0 - tyre reviewed on January 24, 2012   
Given 70% while driving a Honda Accord (225/35 R18) on mostly town for 15,500 average miles
Had these tyres fitted to my car for about 25000km (15500 miles) on Australian roads found to be very responsive in dry conditions, wet was not as impressive but safe (with sensible driving). Suited well to my suspension set-up. road noise was definitely apparent but is expected with many low profile tyres on the market and was not overwhelming in a modified vehicle. Managed to get considerably large mileage considering giving them a fairly hard time towards the end of their life (although was babied at new). These are good tyres which I can recommend to a daily driver and should not be criticised due to lack of knowledge or experience. Would certainly buy again.
cheers, Leo
0 - tyre reviewed on December 3, 2010   
Given 86% while driving a Mazda MX5 (205/45 R16 W) on a combination of roads for 0 spirited miles
Just read the previous reviews-bah!
These tyres are for cars with proper handling Suspension. My car has been set up correctly (with me sitting in it at the time), and these tyres have kept me on the road where others would have failed. Dry grip is excellent, cars steps out when asked with no nasty surprises. Take it easy in the wet tho, but you should always take it easy on wet roads!! better when all four wheels are fitted with these boots. Problem today is, every body thinks they know how to drive and then blame the tyres when thier 'knowledge' is put to the test. Don't blame the tyres-blame the nut behind the wheel!
0 - tyre reviewed on February 2, 2010   

See all 9 customer reviews of the Hankook Ventus K104 (newest first) >>