Minerva minerva F109

Dry Grip 70%
Wet Grip 44%
Road Feedback 54%
Handling 50%
Wear 50%
Comfort 62%
Buy again 38%

The Minerva minerva F109 is a Touring Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Car

Show All

Tyre review data from 5 tyre reviews averaging 53% over 24,700 miles driven.

Latest Group Test Results

2016 Market Overview - Braking Test - 43rd of 50 tyres

Sorry, we don't currently have any label data for the Minerva minerva F109
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Minerva minerva F109. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!

Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

capatha

To verify you're human please type the word you see above in the box below.


Top Minerva minerva F109 Review

Given 83% while driving a Volvo V40 Estate (195/55 R15) on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
I have driven on these tyres for 5000 km and have never experienced any problems. They are great for the price.
20 - tyre reviewed on May 7, 2016   

Latest Minerva minerva F109 Reviews

Have you driven on the Minerva minerva F109 tyre?

Please help millions of other drivers make an informed tyre choice and pick the correct tyres for their car by submitting your review of the minerva F109.

Review Your Tyres >>

Given 46% while driving a CitroŽn c3 Picasso 1.6 diesel (195/55 R16 H) on mostly country roads for 2,500 easy going miles
Perfectly ok grip in dry and wet, with good resistance to aquaplaning. Quite comfortable. I would recommend this tyre if it weren't for two serious drawbacks:

1. Sidewalls are too soft, cars feels insecure in cornering. My car is small MPV.
2. Rubber gets too old too fast. Treadwear is not a problem, I have 5 mm left but I had to replace the tyres because of rubber getting too old. Cracks and uneven tread, making vibrations and an unstable drive.The tyres are 6 years old.
0 - tyre reviewed on August 10, 2019   
Given 28% while driving a Lancia Ypsilon 0.9 Twinair 85 (185/55 R15 H) on mostly country roads for 1,200 easy going miles
Girlfriend had these on the rear of a Lancia Ypsilon 312. Already on the car when she got the car. They were horrible.
In a wet turn the car suddenly oversteered.
Also they were noisy, and seemingly extremely snappy..

The tyres were 2 years old, but already had many cracks in the rubber.

Replaced them asap after the spin with Vredestein Sportrac5 which were already at the front.
0 - tyre reviewed on January 4, 2018   
Are cheap winter tyres safe, or a false economy? Watch this video to find out!
Given 63% while driving a Mazda 2 SP (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 1,000 spirited miles
My demio is light in the front these are an improvement on the original set but being a front wheel drive it has better traction on acceleration but still ploughs when decelerating and turning into corners. not recommended for Winter conditions.
1 - tyre reviewed on April 11, 2017   
Given 83% while driving a Volvo V40 Estate (195/55 R15) on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
I have driven on these tyres for 5000 km and have never experienced any problems. They are great for the price.
20 - tyre reviewed on May 7, 2016   
Given 40% while driving a Mitsubishi Lancer 1.8 4 Door (2008) (195/50 R16) on mostly town for 15,000 average miles
Lasts maximum for three years, after turns into plastic.
0 - tyre reviewed on March 9, 2016   

See all 5 customer reviews of the Minerva minerva F109 (newest first) >>