Nexen CP672

The Nexen CP672 is a Touring All Season tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

Dry Grip 83%
Wet Grip 70%
Road Feedback 71%
Handling 66%
Wear 77%
Comfort 75%
Buy again 77%
Snow Grip 90%
Ice Grip 90%

Tyre review data from 12 tyre reviews averaging 78% over 129,418 miles driven.

The CP672 is ranked 27th of 71 All Season Touring tyres.

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Nexen CP672

Size Fuel Wet Noise Weight
195/65 R15 91H   C C 73  
215/65 R16 98H   E C 73  

Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Nexen CP672. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!

Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

capatha

To verify you're human please type the word you see above in the box below.


Top 3 Nexen CP672 Reviews

Given 71% while driving a Audi A3 (205/60 R15) on mostly town for 0 average miles
Tyres are ok so far driven about 1000 miles and the grip is good,little to no roadnoise, overall a pretty decent tyre for price.
Helpful 126 - tyre reviewed on April 7, 2013
Given 87% while driving a BMW 218d Active Tourer (245/45 R17 H) on a combination of roads for 30,000 spirited miles
Best cost vs. quality to me. Use on BMW e60 530i.
Helpful 52 - tyre reviewed on December 2, 2018
Given 42% while driving a Hyundai i40 tourer (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 100 average miles
I tend to always buy in the $100-150NZD range for my cars, this is the first time I am removing tyres from my vehicle for any reason other than wear. Pros: Comfort is improved over the Kuhmo and Yokohama sets I have had on the car. Dry grip is acceptable for the price point. Cons: Wet grip is terrible and the reason these tyres are leaving my car after a week. The car even in damp conditions (not wet) either understeers or loses traction. Wheel spin on slight uphill starts is noticeable and the only tyres I have this issue. These are the only tyres I have had that I am removing from my car because they give me no confidence.
Helpful 19 - tyre reviewed on February 10, 2022
Have you driven on the Nexen CP672 tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Nexen CP672? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Nexen CP672 >

Latest Nexen CP672 Reviews

Given 23% while driving a Volkswagen e Golf (205/55 R16) on mostly town for 800 average miles
Horrific in wet. Don’t buy them
Helpful 16 - tyre reviewed on February 1, 2021
Given 87% while driving a Peugeot 4007 (2.2HDi) (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 26,000 easy going miles
had these on all 4 corners of a 4007/Outlander/CCrosser for 26 months.
covered about 26000 miles.
Front wore at on edges possibly down to wheel alignment. and as a result need replacing now.
Centre tread still at 3.5-4mm (well above tyre wear indicators.)
still gripping well, just a little loss of confidence in feedback from steering at low speed.
country lanes and bends stick gripping well.
Rears, 26000 miles and counting, still going strong and plenty of tread left all across the tyre.

Mostly rural driving and motorways, no issues in the wet or icy conditions.
being a rural driver they inspire confidence in off tarmac situation, mud/grass/water. pulled many a car or van out of fields.
The 2017-2018 winter was the first time i got to try them in snow.. (after so 18months/18000 miles worn)
no drama, snow, ice, slush, even compacted polished snow on hills.

not sure how much is the tyre or how much is the car..
not quite as confident in snow (going down hill) as i was in my old Freelander with Michelin Synchrones.
(though that was with hill descent on. 4007 doesn't have that.)
but certainly capable.

never been stuck yet, even when i thought i might be, even with worn front edges.
smooth and quiet at motorway speeds.
Helpful 29 - tyre reviewed on October 4, 2018
What to know the BEST All Season Tyres for 2024? Click to find out!
Given 90% while driving a (215/65 R16 H) on mostly country roads for 27,278 average miles
Fitted to 2015 Korando 2.0 SE4. Just checked for wear on front after 27278 miles and have 4 to 5mm left.

Look pretty good to me.
Helpful 31 - tyre reviewed on May 20, 2018
Volkswagen (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 16,000 average miles
good tire overall, very good wear, poor grip and handling, ok comfort
Helpful 42 - tyre reviewed on February 19, 2018
Given 89% while driving a Honda Accord (225/50 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
I am using this tyre in my car (in UAE) for nearly 2 years. The surprise factor is its mileage till date. It is done 110K Kilometers and still running with good grip. I was using Maxxis before it and I did 80K with that.
Helpful 32 - tyre reviewed on February 17, 2018
Given 85% while driving a (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 17,000 spirited miles
car SsangYong korando 14 plate 18"wheels only done 17k miles in it happy in all aspects with tyres particularly pouring rain lots of it in the mountains of wales wear seems pretty good I had a suspension fault from new seized that must tell us something good, caster and camber well out and toe in all wrong did wear hedge of all tyres but still safe to drive on them 5mm tread over 3/4 of tyres width would recommend if you keep speed down to 70ish motorways and not going around corners like a lunatic, tyres comfortable but a little noisy in bad rain car stable all the time iv never had it skid in the slightest tyre test say CP672 my tyres say premium CP672A don't know if different tyre and mine say s&m on them. I am looking at going back to Good Year Efficiency safe better mpg gallon on my last car. hope this of some help
Helpful 23 - tyre reviewed on November 11, 2015
Given 88% while driving a Mitsubishi lancer (205/60 R16) on a combination of roads for 240 average miles
Replaced my UHP's with these and what a revelation! Quiet, buttery-smooth drive henceforth.
Helpful 19 - tyre reviewed on June 21, 2014
Audi A3 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 12,000 average miles
Update driven over 12000 miles with them so far and its great, wear is great, no noise,overall a pretty decent tire.
Helpful 26 - tyre reviewed on October 9, 2013