Nexen N Blue ECO

Dry Grip 84%
Wet Grip 76%
Road Feedback 75%
Progressiveness 74%
Wear 76%
Comfort 73%
Buy again 80%
Nexen N Blue ECO

The Nexen N Blue ECO is a Touring Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Car

Show All

Tyre review data from 19 tyre reviews averaging 77% over 180,338 miles driven.

Sorry, we don't currently have any label data for the Nexen N Blue ECO

Questions and Answers for the Nexen N Blue ECO

2016-04-19 - Who makes this tyre?

Nexen make the Nexen N'Blue ECO tyre.

Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

Size Price Range  
195/55 R15 £40.38 - £66.00 (14 Prices) Compare Prices >>
195/65 R15 £35.44 - £45.50 (41 Prices) Compare Prices >>
205/60 R15 £41.18 - £50.70 (5 Prices) Compare Prices >>
205/65 R15 £38.10 - £49.20 (15 Prices) Compare Prices >>
Available in 57 tyre sizes - View all.

Nexen N Blue ECO Reviews

Given 63% (breakdown) while driving a Honda Civic (175/65 R14 H) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
Not bad cheap tire, very good value for money buy. Negative sides are noise, which gets to you on long rides and wear. Their thread depth is nothing to write home about from new, let alone after 5, 10k miles. Best thing abut them is how they handle when cornering: very assured, no understeer whatsoever, they literally feel grippy. Wet braking is decent, dry braking is nothing spectacular, but nothing dangerous as well. Fuel consumption is very low, even unrealistic.
1 | - tyre reviewed on April 13, 2016   
Given 100% (breakdown) while driving a Toyota AYGO (155/65 R14 T) on mostly country roads for 11,838 average miles
Just buy it !
0 | - tyre reviewed on February 27, 2016   
Given 50% (breakdown) while driving a Toyota Avensis (215/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 11,000 easy going miles
I purchased a full set last year when a friend recommended them. Usually I manage between 18 - 24k on a set of tyres however these Nexens have 11k miles under their belt and I've just replaced them. After 6 months I rotated front to back as the fronts were down to 3mm. Dry grip is good but in the wet they have very little traction and makes driving "interesting". The only good point with these tyres is the way they deal with standing water when driving in a straight line - the huge width of the grooves displaces all the water and hydroplaning never happens. I've reverted back to Maxxis tyres as I had a set before the Nexens and they gave me 18k miles and the wet grip is phenomenal for the price.
0 | - tyre reviewed on December 18, 2015   
Given 89% (breakdown) while driving a Ford Focus 2.0 TDCI Titanium (225/45 R16 V) on a combination of roads for 19,000 average miles
for the money these are a 1st class tyre, 19k miles on the front of 2.0tdci focus says it all, good comfort and quiet.
0 | - tyre reviewed on December 9, 2015   
Given 41% (breakdown) while driving a Nissan Elgrand Rider 3.5L (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 13,000 spirited miles
I had a new set put on when I purchased my van. They have performed well in terms of grip, but the wear is pitiful. I've done 13,000 miles, the fronts are on the limit and the rears are down to 3mm. I don't buy budget tyres for this reason, it's a false economy, spend £20-30 more per tyre and get 3 times the lifespan, it's a no-brainier.
0 | - tyre reviewed on October 28, 2015   
Given 91% (breakdown) while driving a Renault Koleos (225/60 R17 V) on a combination of roads for 6,000 average miles
In fact, I was astonished how can this cheap tyre worked like much more expensive Nokian tyre. It is litle noisy but I don't hear it much in this car. Otherwise, for normal driving very recommended. Will buy it again!
0 | - tyre reviewed on July 12, 2015   
Given 83% (breakdown) while driving a Renault espace mk3 (205/65 R15 R) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
I've had these on my Mark 3 diesel Renault Espace for the past 10000 miles. I chose these because they seemed to have the best review of any budget tyre in the price range. I have been going on country lanes and up and down the M20. The car has always behaved excellently - some noise on the motorway (depending on the road surface) but I would recommend them to anyone.
-1 | - tyre reviewed on April 29, 2015   
Given 77% (breakdown) while driving a Volkswagen Golf (195/55 R15) on a combination of roads for 20,000 average miles
These are not bad tyres. You may want to check the professionals reviews, but I would recommend them to a driver who wants good quality for the money.
0 | - tyre reviewed on February 16, 2015   
Given 28% (breakdown) while driving a Ford Fiesta (195/50 R15 H) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
If you have a death wish buy these!!!!!!!! in the dry its noise and the wet its like a top gear promo scene dam right dangerous!!!!! Like all Budget Brands Should be BANNED
-2 | - tyre reviewed on January 30, 2015   
Given 71% (breakdown) while driving a Renault Clio 1.5 dCi 86 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
Just put them on the front of a Clio III on 195/50/16. Very good value ! Good grip on the dry, surprisingly good on the wet, no understeering even on roundabouts if you don't drive like hell.
Noise is bearable. Response is alright. Braking lenght seems a bit long, the ABS system seems to work a bit more...
If they last at least 20 000 km it will be a great value.
1 | - tyre reviewed on May 7, 2014