tyre reviews by tyre tyre reviews by car tyre articles submit tyre revew discussion about tyres
tyre reviews and ratings

Mercedes Benz C320 Tyres

Drive a Mercedes Benz C320? Why not add your own tyre review and help other owners pick the right tyre!

The following tyres have been reviewed on the Mercedes Benz C320
Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002 (7) 94% 84% 88% 81% 73% 83% 91% 85% 12,200
Falken FK452 (153) 83% 75% 75% 74% 70% 76% 77% 76% 2,069,233
Michelin Primacy HP (85) 85% 75% 75% 72% 75% 76% 67% 75% 2,026,075
Continental Premium Contact 2 (73) 86% 79% 74% 69% 62% 77% 68% 74% 1,775,131
Continental Sport Contact 2 (129) 83% 73% 75% 70% 60% 68% 62% 70% 2,425,530

Mercedes Benz C320 Tyre Review Highlights

Writing about the Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002 given 93% (225-45-17-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 5000 spirited miles
Got the RE002 after I depleted the RE11. The tyres needed around 1000Km to run in. After the 1000Km, it give me the same kind of traction RE11 would have give me on dry pavement and at least 90% on wet, but they only cost three third of RE11. I will suggest everyone give it a try.
Posted at 2012-01-24 18:47:25
Writing about the Michelin Primacy HP given 90% (205-55-16-W)
Driving on a combination of roads for 30000 average miles
Bought my Michelin Primacy's (4 new) 3 years ago and done 30,000 miles since, and only now have just replaced the rear two!! The fronts still have 4mm on them.
Needless to say I just bought two new Michies.

These tyres last forever and are excellent quality!
Posted at 2010-02-16 22:14:51
Writing about the Continental Premium Contact 2 given 79% (225-50-16-W)
Driving on mostly motorways for 33000 average miles
Had a set of Continental Sport contacts on this car when new. They wore out too quickly for my liking (15k on the front, 20k on the rear). Drove a mates E220K and noticed how quiet the tyres were on his vehicle and decided to replace mine with the same recipe of Continentals as fitted to his E-Class ie Premium contact 2. They are extremely quiet as far as road noise is concerned (very, very impressive). Don't think the grip is as good as the Sport contacts (no surprise) particularly when cornering hard as the car tends to break away at the back a bit quicker. They're wearing about the same as the original Sports - so no better there. I'd buy the Premium Contacts again though purely on the added refinement afforded to an already quiet car.
Posted at 2009-03-21 22:17:39
Writing about the Continental Sport Contact 2 given 69% (225-45-17-W)
Driving on a combination of roads for 20000 average miles
Fairly quiet tyres and seem to grip as well as anything else I've tried in the dry and wet.

I have to say the 4 bands give the tyre a really F1 look which is why I picked them!!

Recommended if not doing trackdays etc!
Posted at 2007-08-23 00:56:41
Writing about the Falken FK452 given 66% (245-40-17-W)
Driving on a combination of roads for 10000 average miles
Replaced Bridgestone with these. Overall not a bad tyre with good grip in the dry. Less sure footed in the wet and positively useless in snow! No rubbing ridge to protect alloys from kerbing is a shame. Road noise is acceptable and on a par with Bridgestones they replaced. Disappointed with wear as only got 10,000k miles with average driving before reaching 3mm. The offers available on premium brands makes these less attractive and I've gone for Conti sport contact3 this time.
Posted at 2009-12-29 17:09:59
Drive this car? Why not add your own tyre review and help other owners pick the right tyre!


Want this tyre? TyreReviews has joined forces with lovetyres.com to offer unbeatable prices on the best rated tyres. Combine the trust of your local fitting centre with these great prices on the best tyres on the market!
Width:
Profile:
Height:
Speed Rating: