Apollo Aspire 4G

Dry Grip 86%
Wet Grip 69%
Road Feedback 80%
Handling 77%
Wear 63%
Comfort 79%
Buy again 60%
 
Size Price Range  
Available in 1 tyre sizes - View all.

Apollo Aspire 4G Reviews (newest first) - Page 1

Given 43% while driving a Kia Motors (225/45 R18 V) on mostly town for 500 average miles
These tires are ok for the price, I had nexen tires before and they were very good on road specially wet grip and comfort also, Apollo tires are not good for wet grip and they are noisy also. Not buying again
0 - tyre reviewed on October 29, 2020   
Given 94% while driving a Volvo S60 T5 250bhp (245/40 R18) on mostly town for 1,000 average miles
Dry grip- It grips excellently. Fewer traction control light flash at take offs on 177kw 320Nm car.

Wet grip- Only drove less than 2000km on the dry. Have not really experience wet driving yet.

Handling- This is where this tire shines. Its very stable and predictable and way better than the Continental Sport Contact 5p's I have replaced.

Comfort/Noise - It soaks bumps well for a 40 aspect ratio tire and it is a rather quite tyre.

Buy again- I will definitely buy it again and again. Best value for money
8 - tyre reviewed on October 22, 2019   
Given 93% while driving a Ford Escort RS2000 4x4 (215/45 R17 V) on a combination of roads for 30 spirited miles
You guys are not leaving proper reviews
Apollo are a mid range brand there for u cant compare them to brands like Bridgestone or continental
As a mid range tyre these are the best ull get
If u want a better tyre pay more money
Tyres u get what u pay for
18 - tyre reviewed on December 31, 2018   
Given 50% while driving a Audi A6 Avant 2.0TDi 170 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 17,782 average miles
Catastrophic experience, and I can compare with others !

Original mount on my Audi A6 Avant (III) from 2011, a non really explosive engine but still 170 hp from the 2.0 TDi, was a Bridgestone Turanza ER300 205/50R16-96W -> 50'408 KMs then dropped
The Apollo Aspire 4G 225/55R16-99Y were dead after 28'617 kms !!

(comparison with winter mounts:
Continental WinterTS810 205/60R16-92H lasted 67'592 kms
Vredestein Snowtrac 3 205/60R16-92H are on the car for a new season)

J_e_f_f
13 - tyre reviewed on January 11, 2017   
Given 87% while driving a Toyota Camry (225/50 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 44 spirited miles
Very good tire on dry and wet roads.Sometimes I drive on the limits, but the tire still has a very good grip. With them, I have traveled 70k km have abit noise and everything fine when compare with price
and I will buy again.
14 - tyre reviewed on June 23, 2016   
Given 63% while driving a Peugeot 308 1.6 HDi (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 6,000 average miles
Was talked into these by my garage, never again. It's not that they're terrible but over priced for what they are.

I aquaplaned on them once. It was in a corner going down hill in the rain, certainly not at a dangerous speed and the tyres lust lost it.

Had Dunlops before that and they were great. Now have Nokian winters which are amazing!
78 - tyre reviewed on December 24, 2015   
Given 83% while driving a Lexus IS250SE (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 1,500 spirited miles
What a pleasant surprise. These tyres were already fitted to a newly refurbished set of alloys I purchased. I have previously had many premium brands, mainly michelin, bridgestone. These tyres are very very good, wet and dry grip is excellent. I have not pushed to the extreme limit as I drive 'press on' not like a lunatic! They grip and inspire confidence. Like most people I drive the same route to work and I can certainly feel the improved levels of grip compared to michelin pilot primacy, these were not worn out BTW. Cannot comment on wear as I have only had them 2 months.
16 - tyre reviewed on June 22, 2015