Mohawk M112

Dry Grip 59%
Wet Grip 34%
Road Feedback 45%
Handling 39%
Wear 54%
Comfort 47%
Buy again 28%

Mohawk M112 Reviews (newest first) - Page 1

Given 17% while driving a Daihatsu Materia (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
Absolutely no lateral grip in the wet, noisy, hard compound spoils the ride and terrifying in the wet. Fitted to a car purchased a week ago second hand, replacing now with Fulda Eco Control, the exact opposite of these truly awful tyres.
9 - tyre reviewed on August 10, 2017   
Given 38% while driving a Dacia Logan (265/65 R15 T) on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
Bought theze from HiQ Tyrez, having asked for medium range tyde. Never heard of them before but have now driven for around 1000 miles on them on the front. Have been OK in dry weather but with the first rain for a while, I have nearly scared myself stupid several times. I thought it was just a road surface problem at first but now don't trust the tyres. Pulling away from a junction in the wet, I get wheel spin most times. AVOID THESE LIKE THE PLAGUE!!!
6 - tyre reviewed on July 21, 2017   
Given 80% while driving a Volkswagen jetta 1.6 (225/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 0 spirited miles
Never heard of them before came on the car brand new was surprised had very little problems with them. Not like the other cheap brands
2 - tyre reviewed on July 4, 2017   
Given 31% while driving a Ford Focus (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 200 average miles
Have driven on these for a few hundred miles from brand new and were worst mistake I have ever made in tyre choice, should be banned as so dangerous grip in anything other than bone dry must be a Z in tyre rating and dry grip a F
13 - tyre reviewed on November 9, 2016   
Given 34% while driving a Ford Focus ST (235/40 R18) on mostly motorways for 2,000 average miles
These are the worst tyres I have ever owned. Put on for me by TRUST Ford Bradford. They must have really disliked me. They are dangerous and feedback from them is none existant. If you have some drive with caution.
9 - tyre reviewed on September 21, 2016   
Given 27% while driving a Mazda MX5 (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 3,000 spirited miles
Inherited Mohawk tyres when I bought an MX5 - lost back end several times on roundabouts in rain - replaced them with with Michelin Pilot Sport and the difference is unbelievable.
2 - tyre reviewed on September 12, 2016   
Given 79% while driving a Jaguar XF (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 2,000 easy going miles
Bought tyres second hand 3 months ago, had no trouble whatsoever. I would say, the users with the grumbles have not looked closely enough at the tyre walls and seen the word ' outside' printed on them and put them on the wrong way round.
54 - tyre reviewed on August 16, 2016   
Given 31% while driving a CitroŽn Saxo VTR (185/55 R14 H) on a combination of roads for 6,000 average miles
I inherited these tyres on my Saxo VTR (No, I'm not a boy racer - I'm in my 40's) and can quite confidently say they are dreadful in the wet, actually downright dangerous.

The tyres have very little wear, so it isn't down to their age. At the slightest hint of moisture on the road driving becomes more like a "skidpan" experience. Aquaplaning across two lanes on the motorway whilst only doing 55mph is not remotely amusing, nor is having to hold my breath every time I enter a roundabout. If you have these tyres, get them changed ASAP - the cost will pay for itself next time it rains.
4 - tyre reviewed on September 27, 2015   
Given 89% while driving a Vauxhall (205/50 R16 W) on a combination of roads for 250 average miles
Used these for a few years now, small Corsa van. Average around 45-50k miles per set of tyres and they perform great all round. I do a lot of miles, sometimes 2 sets per year so have plenty of use/experience with them.
I had Federals and Hankooks before these and I rate the Mohawk's better in every respect.
All good for a semi budget tyre, and better than some big brand names
1 - tyre reviewed on June 17, 2015