Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Reviews - Page 3

Given 96% while driving a Skoda Octavia 4x4 Hatchback (225/40 R18) on mostly motorways for 32,300 average miles
Superb tyre! Can't believe these tyres have done in excess of 32000 miles and still 3mm on the front, and 4mm on the back. Driven through all four seasons and never once felt unsafe in the car, excellent steering feel, grip is incredible on both wet and dry roads and gives you the confidence to have bit of fun around the country B roads.
The only negative is that the ride is a bit firm, however, that won't be helped with the firm suspension of my VRS. Thinking of getting a new set of tyres in a couple of thousand miles, would definitely get another set of these tyres.
Helpful 20 - tyre reviewed on April 15, 2017
Given 56% while driving a SEAT Ibiza Cupra 1.4 TSI (215/40 R17) on mostly town for 28,750 average miles
after 46000km with these tyres i definetely say that i would not buy these tyres again. why? the answer is simple. very noisy,comfort level is low. dry and wet grip is almost perfect, wear is avarage thanks to stone feeling. these tyres would be more comfortable on the size 205 45 17. however, not an first choise such a car like ibiza cupra. coz cupra isolation is low, road noise and comfort are only avarage. i will replace them with hankook ventus v12 evo2 in few days.
Helpful 20 - tyre reviewed on February 20, 2017
Given 77% while driving a Holden Commodore VE (245/45 R18 V) on a combination of roads for 42,000 easy going miles
First factory tires, lasted 42.000 miles or 68.000km and still in the legal limit in the middle of the tire and just on the limit on the outside got replaced with hankook noble 2 only because I got a good deal.

Potenza is very strong durable are reliable tire in that class, 220aud, no wow effect but good quality tire that wont let you down, dry or wet.
Helpful 34 - tyre reviewed on September 13, 2016
What to know the BEST All Season Tyres for 2024? Click to find out!
Given 46% while driving a Volvo V70 D5 185 Geartronic (245/40 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 7,000 average miles
245/40 R18 fitted to a Volvo v70 D5 185 BHP, driven for the last 7000 miles of their life.

White line like a cocaine addict.
Noisy, torque steer under heavy acceleration, poor traction off the line, excessive wheel spin under hard acceleration.
Grip in corners OK, prone to aquaplaning on any puddle ride is harsh.

Replaced with Dunlop Sportmaxx RT2 and the addition has gone, traction of the line is much better (no more traction control killing acceleration), noticeably quieter, still on rear for now but not so important.
Helpful 13 - tyre reviewed on August 31, 2016
Given 86% while driving a Subaru Legacy (205/55 R16 W) on mostly town for 30,000 spirited miles
It's a good Tyre . but i can't find anymore . :(
Helpful 10 - tyre reviewed on August 8, 2016
Given 49% while driving a SEAT Ibiza (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 20,600 easy going miles
For a premium tyre I think they should be better. In wet, particularly, of course you don't have the same feedback in dry. But It is very discrepant, that should not be like that. And in the dry they worm out very easily in a sporty drive. You have to reduce the speed and wait... then you continue with the fun. These are a confuse tyres. If you have a relaxed driving, they are enough. But if you have a sporty drive forget this tyre. Honestly I hate them. For now I bought a set (of two) Dunlop Sport Maxx RT2.

Sorry for my english lol
Helpful 12 - tyre reviewed on July 20, 2016
Given 80% while driving a Holden SS Commodore (245/40 R19 R) on a combination of roads for 60,000 spirited miles
I've had these across two mag wheel sizes on my VE SS Holden Commodore and I must say that they are brilliant. The two BIGGEST problems with this tyre which is why most people switch from them is COST vs WEAR. They wear fairly quickly and cost a bucket load.

That said, these tyres 'in my opinion' of using various sizes over 5 years drive the same in the wet and the dry virtually. The 18's are slightly more grippy then the 19's I found in the wet but other then that DAMN BRILLIANT.

I just decided to try a different tyre and went cheap. Through on some Maximus M1's and they are HORRIBLE compared to the Bridgestone RE50's.

Round a round about, slide out from under me......... no warning, not predictable. Never EVER have I had that happen with a Bridgestone RE50.

Stick with whats great even if it costs a bucket load of money, it will save your life.

PS. Depending on the car and the setup, I would say if you have a V8 you could get anywhere from 1-3 years on average with these tyres depending on your driving style and tune etc.
Helpful 11 - tyre reviewed on July 16, 2016
Given 49% while driving a Audi A3 2.0 TDI 140 (225/50 R17 W) on mostly country roads for 12,000 average miles
Not impressed at all. Same opinion as most other people it seems - they are very noisy and rough riding in comparison to the Kumhos which I have replaced them with. Audis tend to be quite hard riding cars anyway, but they fit these Bridgestone tyres as OEM equipment and make it even worse. Overpriced - admittedly I was shafted royally by main dealer who failed it on the MOT and left me in no position to buy them from there. Even so, the life of the tyres is not commensurate with the price - pretty much knackered after 12,000 miles. On the plus side they do give good handling and grip - fine if you are the type of driver that presses on a bit as a habit and can afford to blow £400 every year on a new set of tyres. But I am neither of these two categories.
Helpful 10 - tyre reviewed on June 21, 2016
Given 76% while driving a Holden cruze (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 46,600 average miles
Driving a Holden cruze hatchback in Australia. Original tyres when I bought the car brand new in 2013. Mostly city/urban and freeway driving. Done 75,000Kms on it and finally replacing them. Not spirited driving as I like to take t easy. Grip is great during the dry season and very serviceable in the wet. Have punctured 2 since buying he car but throughout its life didn't give me much issues. I would have bought it again if it wasn't pricey as I was happy with the performance.
Quality is good but doesn't reflect the price in my opinion
Helpful 9 - tyre reviewed on June 20, 2016
Given 63% while driving a (235/35 R19 W) on mostly motorways for 20,000 average miles
30.000 km
Are too loud for Brand tires.

Buy again - 0
Helpful 8 - tyre reviewed on April 13, 2016
Given 60% while driving a BMW 320i (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 20,000 average miles
The tires were really good when they were new. After 10k miles the noise became unbearable and the tires needed warm up to behave normally. Tramlining is a thing with these tires. I would not buy them again.
Helpful 13 - tyre reviewed on March 15, 2016
Given 60% while driving a Ford Mondeo Titanium X Sport (235/40 R19 W) on a combination of roads for 8,000 average miles
These came with our car, had to have the front pair replaced by the garage ( free of charge )as they were wearing away unevenly. They have only lasted for 8000 miles and are VERY noisy getting worse as the tread wore away, also grip has signicantly reduced as time goes on. Definately wont buy again. Gonig to buy a set of cheap ones, instead of wasting money on VERY expensive tyres.
Helpful 8 - tyre reviewed on March 1, 2016