Falken ZIEX ZE329

Dry Grip 73%
Wet Grip 54%
Road Feedback 56%
Progressiveness 58%
Wear 35%
Comfort 49%
Buy again 36%
Falken ZIEX ZE329

The Falken ZIEX ZE329 is a Touring Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

Show all

Tyre review data from 9 tyre reviews averaging 51% over 120,599 miles driven.

    Sorry, the Falken ZIEX ZE329 hasn't been featured in any tyre tests yet
Sorry, we don't currently have any label data for the Falken ZIEX ZE329
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Falken ZIEX ZE329. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!

Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

Falken ZIEX ZE329 Reviews

Given 36% (breakdown) while driving a Mercedes Benz C32 AMG (225/45 R16) on a combination of roads for 23 spirited miles
Tires make the car and the rest of the car is there to make the tires work properly - Enzo Ferrari. I am a true believer of this. I do drive "spirited", grew up at race tracks and compete with my father in events at Limerock, Monticello, Pocono speedway and a few other small tracks whenever they have track days. Do not buy these tires!! Forget that they wear fast, that happens, tires are a wear item. The tires themselves are poorly made, and the tread pattern seems like it was just drawn up and not researched at all. No grip..ever, spits water everywhere instead of rooster tails, no comfort in town, loud on the highway, no "feel" of the road, and making emergency maneuvers...might as well cross your fingers and close your eyes. I was told they were comparable to the Yokahama that I had just blown both passenger sides because of construction and a large granite curb in the road, thanks officer who kept telling me I'll be fine. I can't believe that I went with them as normally I only buy tires I know of , but this is all they had that was "comparable". Thank god the 6 month mark is coming up which is when I buy new tires, especially with the summer coming to and end and the wet season coming.
Find this review useful? | - tyre reviewed on August 6, 2014   
Given 20% (breakdown) while driving a Land Rover Range Rover P38 (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 500 average miles
So noisy i had to take them off. complete waste of money!
Find this review useful? | - tyre reviewed on November 3, 2013   
Given 91% (breakdown) while driving a Volkswagen Jetta 2.0tdi Sport (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 60 spirited miles
There is all this hoop la about tires...if you want comfort and grip take 5 psi out..or get softer shocks...duh...if you want track and firm leave at 40 psi or higher...but i only do 38 psi...dont like hard tire ride...know the facts...also low psi is better in the rain...less tire rebound and more contact...I've only had trouble with Kumho Tires...out any tire I have had.
Find this review useful? | - tyre reviewed on July 30, 2013   
Given 100% (breakdown) while driving a Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 5SPD (245/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 0 spirited miles
Great tires. I have them on a 2005 evolution 8. They are slightly stretched onto after market 18x 9.5 inch rims. Never had issues with them. I've had them on for almost a year now. Great all season of tires. In fact they are so sticky I seem to pick up every screw on the road but that's just my luck. Would definitely buy again.
Find this review useful? | - tyre reviewed on June 21, 2013   
Driving a Mitsubishi lancer (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 90,000 easy going miles
I had this for my Mitsubishi Lancer before! Save your money and buy other brand like Dunlop. The quality is poor specially the wall of this tire. I was not able to determine the thread wear because I only had it for 6months because 3 of the tires are already busted. I’m not a racer drifter and im just a regular driver with a 4 cylinder car. Now im using Dunlop Lemans 217/45/R17 for almost 2 years now and im very satisfied with the performance of these rubbers. The thread wear is a little faster compare to others but since I had them until now I have no problems with them.
Find this review useful? | - tyre reviewed on April 28, 2012   
Given 20% (breakdown) while driving a Acura TL TYPE S (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 16 spirited miles
I bought these last year for my 2002 Acura 3.2 TL-S, they are O'K on dry pavement but thet are very loud on the highway, they are trrible in the rain and they are horrible in the snow! Thank God that we didn't have much this year as I slid off of my girlfriend's driveway on two separate occasions on less than 2 inches of snow! I only got about 16,000 miles and they are almost bald, the wear bars are showing on the fronts and they are almost there on the rears. Don't buy these they totally suck!
Find this review useful? | - tyre reviewed on April 6, 2012   
Given 40% (breakdown) while driving a Nissan Maxima GLE (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 9,000 average miles
Tires are ok if you live somewhere with very little rain, dry pavement they handle good, and are fairly comfortable. Rain? Tires may as well be slicks, they are extremely untrustworthy, and don't even try snow. You wont even move, and if you do, you wont stop or turn, experienced quite a few 360's with these tires in the snow and rain. and I am not an extreme driver. Also the treadwear is terrible.
Find this review useful? | - tyre reviewed on February 1, 2011   
Given 60% (breakdown) while driving a Ford fusion (195/50 R16) on mostly country roads for 12,000 spirited miles
Great grip, quiet, protection bead for alloys, but very poor wear. Having said that I went ahead and replaced the 2 front ZEIX 11 months after fitting a new set. Lots of fast, windy roads near me. Replaced when badly worn to markers and deadly in the wet. Rear tyres hardly worn at all.
Find this review useful? | - tyre reviewed on November 14, 2010   
Given 44% (breakdown) while driving a SEAT Ibiza 1.9 Tdi (205/45 R16 V) on a combination of roads for 9,000 spirited miles
Noisy, not very sticky on a dry road and untrustworthy in the wet.
Last set of fronts gave me 9000 miles, previous set fronts gave me 13000 miles. Not impressed. A poor investment
Find this review useful? | - tyre reviewed on July 2, 2010