1. Home
  2. Tyre
  3. Runway
  4. ENDURO 916 Plus

Runway ENDURO 916 Plus

Dry Grip 66%
Wet Grip 53%
Road Feedback 52%
Handling 54%
Wear 62%
Comfort 41%
Buy again 44%

The Runway ENDURO 916 Plus is a High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Car

Show All

Tyre review data from 45 tyre reviews averaging 53% over 487,884 miles driven.

Tyre Test Highlights

2012 Autobild 50 Tyre Braking Test - 40th of 45 tyres

Sorry, we don't currently have any label data for the Runway ENDURO 916 Plus
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Runway ENDURO 916 Plus. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!

Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

capatha

To verify you're human please type the word you see above in the box below.


Top Runway ENDURO 916 Plus Review

Given 33% (breakdown) while driving a Volvo V70 T5 (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 10,000 spirited miles
runway performance 926 sucks
43 - tyre reviewed on May 30, 2016   

Latest Runway ENDURO 916 Plus Reviews

Have you driven on the Runway ENDURO 916 Plus tyre?

Please help millions of other drivers make an informed tyre choice and pick the correct tyres for their car by submitting your review of the ENDURO 916 Plus.

Review Your Tyres >>

Given 20% (breakdown) while driving a SEAT X Perince (225/45 R18 W) on a combination of roads for 1,500 average miles
Had these fitted to my Seat X-Perince worst tyres in the world very poor dry grip, awful wet grip had no confidence in these tyres at all, if you want to end up in a ditch buy these tyres, if you want to stay on the road buy something else, there was plenty of wear on these tyres but change them because they are RUBBISH
3 - tyre reviewed on October 22, 2016   
Given 33% (breakdown) while driving a Volvo V70 T5 (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 10,000 spirited miles
runway performance 926 sucks
43 - tyre reviewed on May 30, 2016   
Trying to pick the BEST tyre possible for your car? Watch this!
Given 57% (breakdown) while driving a Rover 75 2.0 cdti Tourer (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 18,000 average miles
My secondhand Rover 75 CDTi Tourer Automatic came fitted with Runway Enduro 916+ Sport tyres (225 45 17 94W). To retain matching tyres, when new stock was not freely available, I sourced secondhand part worn tyres.
Pros: During 18,000 miles, at no time did the tyres seem unsafe. I was impressed by how well the car handled in all conditions including cornering, fast roundabouts and once in forced heavy braking in the wet.
Cons: The tyre road noise was noisy on all but the smoothest of tarmac surfaces. At vehicle manufacturers recommended pressures the tyres wore at the edges quicker than the centres.
As all four tyres are soon to be replaced I am considering changing to Michelin Cross Climates.
1 - tyre reviewed on March 13, 2016   
Given 30% (breakdown) while driving a Skoda Octavia (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 10,000 easy going miles
Terrible tyres lasted just over 10k then one of the tyre walls collapsed at 70 mph.
Replaced with Michelin Cross climates......great tyres!
1 - tyre reviewed on January 27, 2016   
Given 15% (breakdown) while driving a Mercedes Benz SLK 230 (205/55 R16 W) on a combination of roads for 800 average miles
Absolute rubbish, they were already on my car when I bought it. The droning noise they made was so bad I thought a wheel bearing had gone, the steering felt dead, ride was very harsh. Replaced them at the earliest opportunity with a quality brand, the car was immediately transformed and is now a joy to drive.
2 - tyre reviewed on April 17, 2015   

See all 43 customer reviews of the Runway ENDURO 916 Plus (newest first) >>